Archive for Mac

Mar
01

More Entourage and DST

Posted by: Q | Comments (0)

Given everything else that’s going on with DST and calendaring, Entourage 2004 is actually fairly straightforward to deal with. However, what if you’re running an older version of Entourage, say Entourage X? Well, MS no longer officially supports that product, so while the default response might be to say “deal with it” or “upgrade to Office 2004, some folks in the Entourage community have put together a workaround to deal with the issue.

It’s worth noting here (they also note this in their posting, but this is important) that this workaround has not been sanctioned or approved by Microsoft, and you do this at your own peril. But it’s actually a fairly straightforward adjustment and has a script developed as well, so compared to the potential damage versus just having all your appointments off by an hour, it’s not too bad. Plus, recovering from a failed modification is easy.

Worth checking out if you’ve got that particular challenge.

Categories : Mac
Comments (0)
Jan
25

Entourage and DST

Posted by: Q | Comments (0)

And here you were thinking that your Mac would be immune to the DST problems that seem to be plaguing the rest of the US. Well, not necessarily. Turns out that Microsoft has included updates in Office Update 11.3.3 for Entourage that handles issues related to calendar items and the new DST rules. And if you’re only using Entourage 2004 for POP3 or IMAP accounts, you’re probably going to be OK. But only if you install Update 11.3.3 (at least according to KB924606).

But, if you’re using Entourage 2004 to connect to an Exchange server, your calendar may just get a little funky for a little while. According to a blog post from the MS Higher Education West group, if the Exchange server has not been updated with the patches to fix the DST issue. Where can I learn about these updates, you may be asking? Well, this Microsoft page has information, and http://www.dstpatch.com/ also has update information.

Bottom line, the patch for Exchange is out, but not necessarily universally installed. The Entourage patch is out, as is the OS update from Apple that allows the core Mac OS to handle the new DST laws. But the Outlook patch is not yet available, so expect that until all three players are updated in a particular location there will be some discrepancies about meetings that are scheduled after March 11, 2007.

My Mac recommendation: go ahead and update to 11.3.3 for Office for the Mac, but be aware of possible DST meeting hiccups until everyone else gets updates.

Comments (0)
Aug
24

Errata on Entourage Media

Posted by: Q | Comments (0)

I have it on good authority that the Entourage media part number listed in page 430 of the SBS 2003 Unleashed book (Q56-00005) is no longer available from Microsoft. There is a new SKU for Entourage media from MS fulfillment, but it’s been ‘bundled’ as part of the R2 set, and is not yet available.

The new part number is Q56-00232 Entourage Mac 2004 Mac English Disk Kit CD (this is listed on http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/sbs/evaluation/faq/prodinfo.mspx). I’ll post an update when I have a better idea that it is actually available. I now have on good authority that not only is the new part number available for order, but someone has actually received their copy of the media. Well, it seems that even though someone was able to order the media, it still has yet to get delivered to that person. Plus another person was having difficulty getting the media ordered. So, it’s back to “I’m not sure what the status is” status on the Entourage media.I received confirmation on 10/23/2006 that the Entourage media is happily in the hands of the person who ordered it in mid-September. I think it’s finally out there…

Categories : Mac
Comments (0)
May
22

First Observations – Intel-based Macs

Posted by: Q | Comments (0)

I originally posted this on my business-focus blog, but though it would be of interest to readers of this blog as well. This is the first post in a series on the new Intel-based Macs.

I have to admit that when I heard Apple was releasing a new series of Macs based on the Intel chip, I was a little befuddled. For years, one of the claims to fame of the PPC and G-series CPUs is that they ran circles around the Intel equivalents in terms of performance. Soon enough, I started hearing about how Apple had, once again, done a fabulous job of porting their entire solution to a completely different hardware structure (ala Motorola 68000 CPU architecture to PPC architecture) in a way that was seamless to the end user. Then there were reports that you could actually install Windows XP and run it on one of the Intel-based Macs, some reports indicating that Windows even ran better on an Intel-based Mac than on your average name-brand Windows-only PC.

Then two announcements caught my attention. The first came from Apple, introducing a public beta of a software known as Boot Camp. The second came from a company I had previously not heard of called Parallels, announcing a solution that would allow you to run non-Mac operating systems in a virtual environment on Intel-based Macs.

Needless to say, my curiosity was piqued, and I started my research. That, combined with several queries from my mixed environment clients, prompted me to acquire an Intel-based Mac and do my own research. What follows are my initial observations of the solutions.
Read More→

Categories : Mac, Technology
Comments (0)
Apr
07

New Options for Windows on Mac

Posted by: Q | Comments (0)

While I was off galavanting around Amsterdam, several announcements came across that will cause a stir in the Mac community.

Apple released a tool called Boot Camp that will allow the new Intel-based Macs to install Windows directly onto the Mac and boot either into Windows or into Mac OS. This is currently a beta product, but it’s expected to be a free tool available to users of the new Macs. This will allow Macs to run Windows and Windows-based apps directly on the Intel chipset, bypassing any virtualization, which will increase the speed of the Windows side. Reports say that Windows XP on the Mac Intel hardware runs faster than on other Intel-based PCs. The downside is that you cannot run both OSes at the same time. If you boot into Windows, you will not be able to run Mac apps or possibly access the Mac data that’s on the drive.

Parallels has released a beta of their product, Parallels Workstation, which will run Windows on an Intel-based Mac in a virtual session. This will allow you to run both OS platforms at the same time, although neither OS will run quite as fast as if it were the only app running on the system (ala Boot Camp).

The Microsoft Virtual PC product for Mac currently will not run on the Intel-based Macs and I am unaware of any expected updates to the current product to allow that. Possibly in a future release, but with the Parallels Workstation price point of $49, it’ll be hard to beat.

Keep your ears open for more developments on this front…

Categories : Mac
Comments (0)
Mar
29

Blank Password == Bad Idea

Posted by: Q | Comments (0)

I fielded a call recently from someone who was having trouble joining a set of Macintosh workstations to the domain in his SBS-based network. He had followed the instructions on this blog as well as in the SBS 2003 Unleashed book, but was still having issues.

We went through the usual suspects: DNS (configured correctly, got lookups from AD just fine), SMB signing (able to access shares on the server with no hccups), and the Directory Access configuration. No matter what he tried, when he clicked the Bind button in Directory Access to join the domain and entered the administrator username and password, Directory Access would get to step 3 of the process and give a password error.

I asked if he was using any special characters in the Administrator password, and that’s when he told me that the Administrator password was blank. As soon as we set the Administrator password to something other than blank, the Mac joined the domain immediately.

This is not the first time I’ve run across network encounters that break when there is no password on the Administrator account. I didn’t ask if he was using a blank password while setting up the system, or if they use a blank Administrator password as normal practice. Bottom line, the password on your Administrator account shoudl be the most complex and most secure password on the network. This is the account that hackers will try first when attempting to compromise security on your network, and an empty password is one of the first that they will attempt to use.

Categories : Mac, Observations, SBS
Comments (0)
Feb
20

Another Mac OS X Worm Reported

Posted by: Q | Comments (0)

Just days after spreading information about a new worm that affects the Mac OS platform, another worm is reported by anti-virus vendors. The Inqtana worm spreads between Apple systems through a Bluetooth vulnerability in the OS. Fortunately, that vulnerability was patched by an update released in mid-2005, so Mac users who have been keeping their systems updated with the latest security updates were never at risk of being attacked by this worm.

But it does begin to feel like the sky is beginning to fall for Mac users who have historically been able to virtually ignore virus and other malware threats on the platform. Those who have kept their eyes and ears open for this type of possibility have known all along that it was only a matter of time before threats finally started showing up on OS X systems.

Practicing good malware prevention applies to all platforms .And the rules are fairly simple:

  1. Keep your systems up to date with the latest security patches.

  2. Don’t open attachments from e-mail messages, especially if you weren’t expecting to receive an attachment from the sender, and even more especially if you don’t know who the sender is.
  3. “Free” software is almost never “free.” Be careful what you download and run on your computer.
  4. Run antivirus software on your computer and keep it up to date.

Follow these simple rules and you’ll avoid most of the malware threats that are out there, regardless of your platform.

Categories : Mac
Comments (0)
Feb
16

Mac OS X Worm Reported

Posted by: Q | Comments (1)

Sophos, Inc., an anti-virus software vendor based in the UK, reports that the first Mac OS X worm has begun to spread. The report, which can be found at http://www.sophos.com/pressoffice/news/articles/2006/02/macosxleap.html?pl_id=9&lang_id=1&lp_keyword=firstosx, details how the worm is spreading through the instant messaging client iChat, disguising itself as a file transfer from another iChat user.

Current estimates are that the spread of this worm is low, according to Symantec. Still, that does not mean that this threat can or should be ignored.

Macintosh users should still employ some level of virus protection, even through the number of Macintosh-specific viruses is small compared to the number of Windows/PC-based threats. Even if virus code cannot be executed on a Macintosh, the Macintosh can still be party to the spreading of a virus or worm by copying infected files from one source to another. For this reason, your Macintosh anti-virus software should be configured to do real time scanning of the disk instead of scanning the disk on a scheudled basis.

This worm will automatically spread itself though the iChat client, so if iChat is not installed on a workstation, it will not be automatically spread. The file could be manually sent to another user via another IM client, or it could be spread by saving the file to a shared file server and run by another Mac user. The iChat client is not required to receive the file containing the worm. The worm can only infect a system if a user opens the file – simply having the file on your system does not mean you are infected.

Categories : Mac
Comments (1)
Nov
27

Automounting SBS Shares on a Macintosh

Posted by: Q | Comments (6)

Anyone who has used a Macintosh in a network environment for several years will remember a feature from OS 9 and earlier versions that allowed you to save logon credentials for a network volume. This would allow users to have those network volumes automatically mount on the Mac desktop when the user logged in on the Mac. As with many other features of the new operating system, this functionality changed with the release of OS X. As a result, there is no longer a simple checkbox that a user can enable to have a network volume automatically mount when the user logs in.

There are several ways to recover this functionality, however. This document details one of the simpler methods. Given the intended audience for this document, there are several assumptions being made.

  1. The Macintosh is running Mac OS 10.4 or later.
  2. The server providing the network volumes is running SBS 2003.
  3. The Macintosh is accessing shares on the SBS server through SMB, not AppleTalk.

Read More→

Categories : How To, Mac, SBS
Comments (6)
Nov
26

Safari and Companyweb

Posted by: Q | Comments (3)

I’ve been assisting a client of mine in California with getting a number of Macs connected to a new SBS 2003 server for one of his installations. We have been able to get most of the issues resolved, but he hit me with one recently that I couldn’t nail down immediately. One of the newer Macs could not load http://companyweb from Safari.

At the time of his request, I was off site, and as a quick check, I made a VPN connection to another client site from my PowerBook and attempted to load companyweb from that site in Safari. I couldn’t make an immediate connection, which I wrote off as DNS. However, I did try to connect using the SSL interface to companyweb: https://servername:444/ which connected immediately. I was prompted for a username and password (understandable since the Mac does not have Windows authorization credentials cached) and got in to browse through all of the pieces of companyweb.

I reported this back to my client, but wanted to do a full examination in my test network. Here’s what I found…
Read More→

Categories : How To, Mac, SBS
Comments (3)