<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outlook Behind ISA 2004 on SBS 2003</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simultaneouspancakes.com/Lessons/2008/01/19/outlook-behind-isa-2004-on-sbs-2003/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simultaneouspancakes.com/Lessons/2008/01/19/outlook-behind-isa-2004-on-sbs-2003/</link>
	<description>Things I Wish I Had Known</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:11:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dale Unroe</title>
		<link>http://simultaneouspancakes.com/Lessons/2008/01/19/outlook-behind-isa-2004-on-sbs-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Unroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simultaneouspancakes.com/Lessons/2008/01/19/outlook-behind-isa-2004-on-sbs-2003/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Thanks Eriq,

I still find myself using MAPI within Outlook in addition to the Exchange connection as well as an IMAPS account.  Somehow I&#039;ve been getting along with ISA 2004 and SBS 2003 without that FWC Outlook change.  I never new this issue existed.  After rereading your information I think I&#039;m confused when you conclude that Secure NAT SMTP/POP connection are denied by default.  Both SBS rules for Outgoing POP &amp; SMTP use the All Users group and I didn&#039;t discovered any authentication requirements.  Perhaps you could explain a little more about the Secure NAT aspect you discovered.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eriq,</p>
<p>I still find myself using MAPI within Outlook in addition to the Exchange connection as well as an IMAPS account.  Somehow I&#8217;ve been getting along with ISA 2004 and SBS 2003 without that FWC Outlook change.  I never new this issue existed.  After rereading your information I think I&#8217;m confused when you conclude that Secure NAT SMTP/POP connection are denied by default.  Both SBS rules for Outgoing POP &amp; SMTP use the All Users group and I didn&#8217;t discovered any authentication requirements.  Perhaps you could explain a little more about the Secure NAT aspect you discovered.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
